Argument
It is not possible to produce a set of rules purporting to describe what a man should do in every conceivable set of circumstancesā
P1: If each man had a definite set of rules that conducts his life, he would be not better than a machine
P2: There are no such rules, so men cannot be machines
C: Man is not machineTuring Response
- Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle
- Humans could instead of being governed by normative laws (stop at red lights) are guided by a set of discrete laws of behavior that regulate his life